09/11/2020 / By News Editors
Last month, Big League Politics reported on Netflix’s release of the film “Cuties,” a coming of age story about an 11-year-old girl who discovers her sexuality by joining a twerking dance troupe.
Article by Shane Trejo republished from BigLeaguePolitics.com)
We're deeply sorry for the inappropriate artwork that we used for Mignonnes/Cuties. It was not OK, nor was it representative of this French film which won an award at Sundance. We’ve now updated the pictures and description.
— Netflix (@netflix) August 20, 2020
However, Netflix refused to ban “Cuties” from its platform despite the outcry. The movie debuted on Wednesday, and it is even more pro-pedophilia than was initially thought.
Netflix damage control tried to center the controversy on the poster, which they changed, but its about the whole movie. The poster was tame compared to the contents on the film!
— 𝗚𝗵𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗝𝗶𝗺 (@GhostJim4) September 9, 2020
The IMDB description of “Cuties” initially gave the movie with a parental warning detailing “highly sexualized & erotic dance scenes that purposefully exploit & objectify numerous scantily clad under age girls.” It also described the movie as featuring “female breast nudity of a minor during an erotic dance scene and lengthy & excessive closeup shots of breasts, and spread crotches of 11 year old girls during numerous sexualized dance scenes.”
The original IMDB warnings can be seen here:
that movie cuties dropped and wtf. this is straight from IMDB 😐 pic.twitter.com/y4RVyQ51ox
— ★ low-nah-gee ★ (@ebonixfem) September 10, 2020
As soon as the accurate description of “Cuties” on IMDB began to go viral, it was immediately changed:
UPDATE! IMDB CHANGED THE LANGUAGE USED. I was in the midst of archiving when changed. This is CRIMINAL. pic.twitter.com/vBHluPR8Jc
— Tracy Beanz (@tracybeanz) September 10, 2020
Liberal commentators – the type of folks who support drag queen story hour events – are now being shamed on social media for defending the horrendously exploitative movie.
deleted, but the List comes for all, @tnyfrontrow.
✍🏼✍🏼✍🏼 pic.twitter.com/O88RjH51WA
— Siraj Hashmi (@SirajAHashmi) September 10, 2020
How is this sentence acceptance under any circumstance?https://t.co/Y4eUhH3Z3G pic.twitter.com/h2xPgupbP6
— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) September 10, 2020
Pay attention to the outlets promoting pedophile film Cuties pic.twitter.com/V2zHUk7oMF
— Jack Posobiec 🏢🏢 (@JackPosobiec) September 10, 2020
Big League Politics has reported on other pro-pedo content that is being produced and released by Netflix:
Another show, “Big Mouth,” is geared toward children and has become more foul and depraved with each season.
A trailer for the animated program posted by Netflix features children engaging in incest with crude references to masturbation…
The show is also mainstreaming the notion of pansexuality, which is a term for extreme promiscuousness, for children as well…
“Big Mouth” creator Nick Kroll revels in children watching his depraved show. He expressed his desire to reach kids during an interview with Kelly Clarkson earlier this year…
“We are not just telling the story of two white straight boys, going through puberty. And really try to expand what puberty, adolescence, and development of human sexuality mean to different people,” Kroll said during an interview with Awards Daily published in June.
“Jay started as a magician kid who liked to have sex with his pillow, and by season three he is a boy trying to understand his bi-sexuality and where he falls in the spectrum of sexuality,” Kroll said about one of the main characters of his show.
IMDB is now complicit in the enabling of pedophilia by removing their accurate warnings about “Cuties.” The people involved with pushing this movie probably should be jailed.
Read more at: BigLeaguePolitics.com
Tagged Under: child exploitation, child porn, crime, evil, hollywood, hypocrisy, left cult, lgbtq, mainstream media, Morality, Netflix, Pedophilia, politics, Social media, trangenderism, Twisted
COPYRIGHT © 2018 INDOCTRINATION.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Indoctrination.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Indoctrination.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.